Toolkit guide

Mental Health

The Context

Europe’s well-developed health and social protection systems provide a strong foundation, but persistent gaps and inequities continue to affect child and adolescent mental health and well-being. An estimated 1 in 6 (16%) children and adolescents aged 0–19 were living with a mental health condition in 2023, rising steeply with age, from around 2% among young children to nearly one in four among adolescents aged 15–19. Between 2013 and 2023, prevalence increased by around 37%.

  • adolescents
is living with a mental health disorder
    approximately
    1 in 6

    children and adolescents aged 0–19 living with a mental health condition

  • mental health conditions emerge during childhood or adolescence
    1 in 2

    adult mental health conditions first emerge by age 18

  • of young people
in the region have unmet mental health needs
    ~37%

    rise in prevalence among children and adolescents over the past decade

The consequences extend well beyond childhood. Global evidence indicates that roughly half of all adult mental health conditions first emerge by age 18, meaning that what happens in childhood and adolescence shapes lifelong outcomes in education, employment and wellbeing.

The impact is not equal. Girls are disproportionately affected in adolescence, with around 29% of girls aged 15–19 estimated to be living with a mental health condition, compared with 21% of boys. Children facing poverty, displacement or discrimination carry compounded risks and face greater barriers to support.

EU Member States have a strong track record of investment in mental health systems, policy innovation and cross-country learning, and many have developed national strategies, expanded community-based services and pioneered prevention approaches that are recognised internationally. The priority now is to build on these efforts: translating a strong and growing evidence base into coherent, equitable and sustained policy across sectors, governance levels and population groups. This toolkit is designed to support that process.

A multisectoral response

Mental health is shaped by — and in turn shapes — education, housing, social protection, digital environments and economic security. An effective response must reflect this interconnectedness by bringing together health, education, social welfare, child protection and other sectors, recognising that every sector has a role to play. Beyond actions taken at government level, an effective response also depends on a whole-of-society effort that engages families, children and young people, communities, civil society and, where relevant, private and digital-sector actors.

A multisectoral approach is therefore of the essence. Multisectoral coordination among line ministries, and with local government, community and civil-society actors, should be strengthened around common goals, clear roles and responsibilities, and coordinated action to ensure that children and families can access the right support at the right time. Prevention, promotion and early intervention must sit alongside treatment, guided by a "health in all policies" approach.

The Pyramid on strengthening mental health and psychosocial support systems and services provides a useful framework for putting this coordination into practice, organising responses across five complementary layers — from safe environments and basic services through to specialised clinical care — ensuring support is accessible, proportionate and scalable, and clarifying which actors are best placed to act at each level.

Pyramid on strengthening mental health and psychosocial support systems and services
  • Level 5
  • Level 4
  • Level 3
  • Layer 2
  • Layer 1
Image
source note
Picture #1: Pyramid of Strengthening Mental Health and Psychosocial Support Systems and Services (Adapted from Regional Report 2022 – Strengthening Mental Health and Psychosocial Support Systems and Services .pdf)

For the system to function as intended, young people, families, caregivers and communities must be active partners throughout, defining priorities, shaping and implementing responses and supporting monitoring and evaluation. Progress should be systematica

Phase 1

Identifying the Problem

Effective policy starts with a clear, evidence-based understanding of the challenges and the factors driving them. This phase helps you build a comprehensive picture of the mental health challenges facing young people face in your context, identify the factors that shape them, and and establish a strong foundation for informed policy action.

Step 1.1

Define the problem and build your evidence base

Why it matters

How a problem is framed shapes that the response that follows: from the interventions selected and the sectors involved, to the way success is defined and measured. For child and adolescent mental health and wellbeing, adopting a systemic perspective, that considers social, structural and environmental determinants, can reveal a broadrange of entry points for effective policy action.

What to do

Questions to guide your work

  • Which children and adolescents in our country are experiencing the worst mental health outcomes, and what is driving this?
  • What data do we have on trends over time and where are the gaps?
  • How well are our current systems equipped to prevent and respond to mental health problems?
  • Who is not being reached by existing services, and why?

Step 1.2

Review European and international frameworks

Why it matters

National policies do not exist in isolation. In the EU, a coherent set of strategic and policy frameworks support action on child and adolescent mental health and wellbeing, underpinned by a rights-based approach and the recognition of every child’s right to the highest attainable standard of health and well-being t. The right is enshrined in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. Understanding these frameworks helps you align your national action with broader regional commitments, access shared evidence and tools, and make the case for investment and reform at national and regional level.

What to do

  • Review the key frameworks and identify how they apply to your national context.
  • Use them to strengthen the evidence base and legitimacy of your objectives.
  • Identify obligations and commitments your country has already made.
  • Look for alignment between proposed actions and regional priorities, as this can support advocacy for resources.

Step 1.3

Define your policy objectives

Why it matters

Clear objectives give direction to everything that follows: they guide the design of interventions, support coordination across sectors, and provide the basis for monitoring progress. Vague objectives or objectives focused only on treatment tend to produce fragmented, reactive responses. Prevention-oriented, cross-sectoral objectives are more likely to drive lasting change.

What to do

  • For each objective, make the link explicit: what evidence or identified need does it respond to?
  • Frame objectives to enable coordination across health, education, social services and other relevant sectors.
  • Ensure objectives are measurable: identify what change would look like and how you would know if it has happened.
  • Balance short-term, deliverable actions with longer-term structural goals.
  • Orient objectives towards promotion and prevention, not just treatment.

A useful way to organise objectives:

Timeframe Example objectives What this looks like in practice
Short to medium term
Strengthen protective environments in schools and families; improve early identification
Implement whole-school wellbeing approaches; train primary care staff in mental health screening
Medium to long term
Enhance coordination and responsiveness of existing systems
Establish cross-sectoral coordination mechanisms; develop shared referral pathways
Long term
Improve population-level wellbeing; reduce structural risk; narrow inequalities in access
Use population surveys to track trends; invest in social determinants; set equity targets

Phase 2

Identifying Solutions and Entry Points

Once you have a clear picture of the problem, this phase helps you assess what is already in place, identify evidence-based solutions, and plan how to address gaps. The goal is a coherent, set of actions, not a collection of disconnected programmes.

Step 2.1

Review existing national policies and frameworks

Why it matters

Before developing new policies, it is essential to understand what is already in place and if this is working or not. A structured review helps identify gaps in coverage, coordination challenges, underserved populations, and lessons from previous implementation. It also avoids duplicating effort or undermining existing effective programmes.

What to do

Conduct a structured review across five domains:

For each domain, assess:

  • Whether existing policies actively support promotion and prevention (not just treatment).
  • Gaps in coverage, coordination or implementation.
  • Which population groups are not being adequately reached.
  • What barriers have affected implementation in the past and what has enabled success.
  • How current policies align (or don't) with European and international frameworks.

Questions to guide your review

  • What do we already have that is working well and should be protected or scaled?
  • Where are the biggest gaps in provision, coordination or population reach?
  • What can we realistically build on within existing systems, rather than creating from scratch?

Step 2.2

Identify good practice solutions

Why it matters

A strong, evidence-based mental health response requires the full continuum of interventions working across sectors, from system-wide structural conditions that shape population-level wellbeing to targeted support for those at highest risk. The Pyramid shown above organizes this continuum into five layers: enabling environments (promotion), universal prevention, targeted prevention, subclinical care and clinical care. Because this toolkit focuses specifically on promotion and prevention, building protective conditions and reducing risk before problems escalate, it draws on the first three layers. The fourth and fifth layers, which address treatment and clinical response, fall outside its scope. Across the three layers covered, the evidence points to a set of common principles: practices are most effective when they are intersectoral, involve trained workforces across sectors, and are embedded in supportive policy frameworks.

What to do: work across three layers

Layer 1 — Enabling and safe environments (promotion)

This layer focuses on the structural conditions, policies and governance arrangements that shape mental health outcomes at system level, creating the environments in which all children can thrive.

Layer 2 — Universal prevention

Universal prevention targets all children and adolescents, regardless of risk level, with the aim of building resilience, promoting wellbeing and preventing the onset of mental health difficulties. Schools and community-based services are the primary settings.

Layer 3 — Targeted prevention

Targeted prevention focuses on children and adolescents at higher risk, providing early, coordinated and proportionate support before difficulties escalate. Key risk factors include family adversity, socioeconomic disadvantage, parental mental health difficulties, exposure to trauma, problematic digital media use, and belonging to marginalised groups.

Step 2.3

Identify stakeholders, tools and coordination structures

Why it matters

Even well-designed policies fail if the right people are not involved, responsibilities are unclear, or coordination breaks down. This step ensures your policy has the governance, partnerships and participation structures it needs to be implemented effectively.

What to do

Questions to guide your work

  • Who needs to be at the table for this policy to succeed and who is currently missing?
  • How will we ensure that children and young people have a real voice, rather than being consulted only formally?
  • What coordination structures already exist that we could use or strengthen?

Phase 3

Implementation and Monitoring

Having a good policy on paper is not enough. This phase focuses on how to make it work in practice, through existing systems, with clear accountability, and with monitoring built in from the start.

Step 3.1

Implement through existing systems

Why it matters

Sustainable implementation means embedding policy actions within health, education and social service systems, not running them as separate projects. When mental health actions are integrated into routine practice, they are more likely to reach those who need them, be adequately resourced, and survive changes in political leadership or funding.

What to do

Questions to guide your work

  • How will this policy be funded and is that funding sustainable?
  • What workforce capacity is needed and what gaps exist?
  • How will we maintain cross-sector coordination when there is pressure to work in silos?

Step 3.2

Monitor performance, equity and system functioning

Why it matters

Monitoring is how you learn whether your policy is working, and for whom. Without it, you cannot identify what needs to change, demonstrate impact, or hold systems accountable. Monitoring should be built into policy design from the beginning, not added on at the end.

What to do

Questions to guide your monitoring

  • Are the children who need support most actually being reached?
  • Are inequalities in mental health outcomes narrowing or widening?
  • Is our monitoring data feeding into real decisions, or just being collected?
  • Are we tracking the inputs (services, workforce) as well as the outcomes?

Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) — A focus on adolescent mental health and well-being (international report, 2021/2022 survey, Vol. 1)

Cover of the HBSC report
  • Source: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2023
  • Topic: Adolescent mental health & well-being
  • Typology: Studies (survey report)
  • Language: EN

Relevant actions: Action 1

This report presents cross-national data on adolescent health and well-being, highlighting trends in mental health, life satisfaction and social environments across Europe, central Asia and Canada. It emphasises growing concerns around psychological distress and inequalities, providing a strong evidence base to inform policies and interventions that support young people's mental health.

Use it to…

Monitor population-level trends and social determinants.

Where to look in this resource

The whole report is relevant — it provides population-level mental health indicators and the breakdowns by age, gender and socioeconomic background to monitor trends over time.